NHL 2007-08 Mid-Season Review

Posted January 10, 2008 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Anaheim Ducks, Atlanta Thrashers, Boston Bruins, Buffalo Sabres, Calgary Flames, Carolina Hurricanes, Chicago Blackhawks, Colorado Avalanche, Columbus Blue Jackets, Dallas Stars, Detroit Red Wings, Edmonton Oilers, Florida Panthers, Hockey, Los Angeles Kings, Minnesota Wild, Montreal Canadiens, NHL Teams, Nashville Predators, New Jersey Devils, New York Islanders, New York Rangers, Ottawa Senators, Philadelphia Flyers, Phoenix Coyotes, Pittsburgh Penguins, San Jose Sharks, St. Louis Blues, Tampa Bay Lightning, Toronto Maple Leafs, Vancouver Canucks, Washington Capitals

newyearrat.jpg2008 is the year of the rat in the Chinese zodiac calendar.

Rats are tough, resilient creatures and often fearless when faced down by much larger animals. They’re also despised filth that live in sewers and eat shit.

So the godfathers of the world’s different species of vermin possess some of the qualities important for athletes to be successful. But they aren’t amongst the more glamorous and prestigious beasts nor are they likely candidates for professional sports team names.

Still, there are examples of such teams in minor and recreational hockey leagues, though some kind of compound noun is usually used to soften the image.

The Albany River Rats play in the American Hockey League (AHL) and are currently affiliated with the Carolina Hurricanes in the NHL.

As 2008 begins, perhaps a sign, however far removed, that the Canes could have a better and more consistent final half of the season.

Though many players have exemplified rat-like qualities over the years, one NHLer became synonymous with the label. Kenny “the rat” Linseman played in the NHL for 13 seasons and established himself as a world class agitator. He riled teams, tormented opposing players and on occasion would throw down the gloves. Though he would just as soon let those he badgered take a penalty for retaliation.

According to legend, he was actually given the nickname because of the way he skated leaning forward with his snout in the air as opposed to the tendencies he supposedly shared with rats.

No doubt there will be more than few incidents in the second half of the 2007-08 season that will see other players compared to the nasy little rodent.

And with most NHL teams having passed the half-way mark in the season, it’s time to look at what’s in store for the remainder of the campaign.

Eastern Conference

The Ottawa Senators have stumbled a few times in the first half but still maintain their relative dominance in the weaker of the NHL’s two conferences. At times, goal-tending has been one suspect area for the Senators, with both Martin Gerber and Ray Emery each having played at least a few poor games.

Gerber is still the number one goalie while the Emery soap opera has become an unwanted distraction. The latest chapter in the tiresome yet eagerly lapped up melodrama involves Emery and his team-mate Brian McGrattan engaging in a scrap at practice.

A highly paid pro athlete who demonstrates this kind of continued behaviour has a limited shelf life. The cachet of having played in the finals last year together with the fact that Emery is still a pretty good netminder should be enough to allow GM Brian Murray the option of shopping him around at the deadline.

The New Jersey Devils got off to a disappointing start to the season but they have ridden Martin Brodeur’s strong play and rattled off two months of consistent efforts to establish themselves as the current leaders in the Atlantic division.

The Carolina Hurricanes’ 46 points (Edit: now at 48 points) would see them out of the playoff race if they were in the Western conference. But it gets them top spot in the league’s weakest grouping in the Southwest division and the accompanying third place in the conference. One of the more exciting teams in the league, the Canes are only second behind the Detroit Red Wings in goals scored but have also surrendered more than 26 clubs in the league.

They also hold that uncommon distinction of having allowed more goals that they’ve scored while still holding onto a playoff spot.

The Toronto Maple Leafs began a road swing in California this week, with games against all three of the state’s NHL clubs. Team President Richard Peddie is accompanying the team, with the tacit qualifier that he needs to be on hand if a trade request comes in for Mats Sundin (not sure how to break the logic of that one down–perhaps to lean on Sundin to waive his no trade clause or maybe because the Sharks and Ducks are two of the teams mentioned most often as being interested in a potential swap.)

With this news the public castration of GM John Ferguson Junior is almost complete. Ferguson could now walk away from the team without further humiliation and not many people would label him a quitter (as absurd as that seems.) While he has apparently been marginalized to a degree that he no longer has full control over the normal duties of an NHL general manager, it seems as though he will still have some say in any big moves made before the trade deadline.

A further example of the poor decision making wracking this organization. The likelihood that Ferguson will be around next season is almost nil yet he may have a say in pulling the trigger on moves that could affect the direction of the team for years to come.

The shortcomings of the Leafs were highlighted by the injury to Vesa Toskala and the team’s record during that stretch was horrid. Many fans are now shamelessly pulling for Toronto to do poorly in the hopes that they will get a high draft pick and start the rebuilding process in the off-season.

That period in the teams’ development can and should start early with a trade of Sundin before the deadline. As much as he means to the team and their fans, allowing Sundin to play out this season as a Leaf and become a free agent is too risky.

Of course there are obstacles to making such a trade. The biggest one being the availability of other teams with acceptable offers for the Swede. A skilled GM would be able to negotiate, entice and put together proposals to help pull off a deal that would benefit the team for years to come.

The nightmare scenario for Leafs fans is a move that sees the organization fleeced for their most prolific and enduring franchise player of all time.

For a team that many picked as winning their division and potentially going deep into the playoffs, the Pittsburgh Penguins got off to a disappointing start. Their young stars have been steady performers, if unspectacular by their standards, but goaltending has been a question mark for them. Circumstances provided a chance for Ty Conklin and he has responded well, rattling off seven straight victories and helping the Pens to an 8-2 record in their past 10.

The Flyers underwent more changes than any other club in the offseason and their strong start seemed to indicate it was paying dividends. Although they have been hit with a slew of injuries and went through one difficult stretch, it appears as though they will remain in the thick of the top eight standings in the east.

Steve Downie may be emerging as a strong NHL forward sooner than anyone expected. Despite all the Downie haters out there (I’ve offered my share of criticism as well) he has the potential to be more than a 3rd or 4th line grinder. The irony is that for all the scorn people heap on him, if he were to take that advice and develop some self-discipline in terms of his on-ice conduct, he would be far more valuable to the team.

If the Flyers make a move to pick up a solid goaltender before the trade deadline, they could be a real threat to wreak some havoc come playoff time.

The Montreal Canadiens have already surpassed expectations for many. Though demoted for the time being, Carey Price has been a strong back-up to Cristoabl Huet and there is not much doubt that he has a long and promising future with the team.

The Washington Capitals, Leafs and Tampa Bay Lightning are essentially out of the playoff race already. There is still a tight grouping in the conference and they are only, respectively, four, five and eight points out of contention. But to close that gap becomes more and more difficult as the season progresses. A four or five game losing streak for any of those teams and it is basically over.

I had almost written off the Capitals earlier in the season but of the three teams I see them as perhaps the only one able to make the Herculean effort required to squeak in. Bruce Boudreau appears to have grabbed the brass ring and connected with his players in a way that is pulling something extra from the depths of their battered souls at just the right time.

A memorable run and qualifying for the playoffs would make the Caps’ eventual offer to Alexander Ovechkin seem a lot more attractive as well. It would hopefully (for their sake) convince him not to become a restricted free agent at the end of a season that had looked like a wash in the early going.

That would make for one hell of an interesting opening round against the Ottawa Senators (assuming the Sens don’t bottle it somehow.) The Capitals have had Ottawa’s number this year, winning all three of their match-ups so far (with one yet to come) by a combined score of 18-10.

They will of course have to put together a long and consistent string of games to catch up with the pack and then emerge ahead of other teams such as the Boston Bruins, New York Islanders, Buffao Sabres, New York Rangers, Atlanta Thrashers and Florida Panthers.

Early in the season the Buffalo Sabres had a hard time adjusting to the loss of Chris Drury and Daniel Briere. They have started to get points from the likes of Jason Pominville, Derek Roy and Thomas Vanek and as a team are in the top ten in goals per game. But without that huge “goals for” advantage they had last season, they haven’t quite found a way to pull out as many of those games decided by fewer goals that are much more common for them this year.

After six straight wins starting in mid-December, the Sabres are currently in the midst of a nasty seven game winless streak (though they have three shootout loss points in that stretch.)

Western Conference

The Detroit Red Wings have run away with the conference and barring some late season disaster will coast into the playoffs as the league’s best team and Cup favourite.

Since the Dallas Stars fired general manager Doug Armstrong and hired Les Jackson and Brett Hull to replace him back on November 13th, they have been one of the best teams in the league. With the exception of a four game losing streak they came out of this week, they hadn’t lost more than two in a row after the switch and have a record of 18-9-1 in that span.

Whether or not the firing and hiring has had any real effect is hard to measure. If it has been felt, then no doubt the benefits are psychological, as the new duo have not made any significant trades (on December 10th defenseman Jussi Timonen was picked up from Philadelphia for a 2009 conditional draft pick) since taking over. The cap era limitations and the team’s performance have made the need for changes less urgent though the two are likely eager to make their influence felt.

The Vancouver Canucks are rolling along under the superb puck stopping ability of Roberto Luongo. Anyone who followed the Canucks run in the playoffs last season and who has also witnessed the inconsistent performance of some of their top scorers this year (i.e. Markus Naslund) has got to think that Dave Nonis will pull off a trade before the deadline. A team just doesn’t have that many years when they possess the potential to make a real run at the Stanley Cup.

In the first month or so of the schedule, the San Jose Sharks didn’t look like the Stanley Cup favourites many had picked them as at the start of the season. Since that time they have been solid in front of the tireless and consistent play of netminder Evgeni Nabokov (41 straight starts this season and a 2.01 goals against average.) They too are mentioned as a team looking to make a move before February 26th (but then which club isn’t with the proliferation of online rumour mongering?)

The Ducks have gotten their legs back and are once again one of the toughest teams to play against. The return of Scott Niedermayer, a healthy Todd Bertuzzi and talk of Teemu Selanne’s comeback in the air are all reasons for the team and their fans to be optimistic. Another organization that shows up in trade rumours though Brian Burke is one general manager who is more likely than most to pull something off before the deadline.

The Calgary Flames are finally living up to some of their potential. Jarome Iginla has been on a blistering pace and depending where the Flames finish out this season, many are already mentioning him as a candidate for the Hart Trophy. Apparently Miikka Kiprusoff has shed his off-season flab, hasn’t been sighted puffing cigarettes for some time and can concentrate on bringing down his goals against average and being one of the better goalies in the league now that he has sewn up a fat long-term contract.

The Minnesota Wild have apparently been sold mere moments ago with a press conference pending. Just the type of off-ice development that can spark a sense of excitement around a team. Perhaps it will prod the Wild out of the funk they have been in recently.

The Colorado Avalanche have slumping lately with injuries to Joe Sakic and Ryan Smyth while the Nashville Predators have been surging.

With their play in recent weeks , the St. Louis Blues in eighth place could make a move in the standings in the second half of the season. With at least one game in hand on teams above them in the standings and as many as five, they have the opportunity to climb within their conference.

Andy McDonald was a little slow in starting to contribute to the Blues’ offense after being traded from the Anaheim Ducks but he notched three points in a game against the Blue Jackets the other night. For the Blues it could be a sign of good things to come.

The Phoenix Coyotes are the surprise of the season. Since they picked up Ilya Bryzgalov off waivers they have been on a real tear. Under the guidance of Wayne Gretzky the Yotes have really started to play with a lot of effort. They have knocked off some of the strongest teams in the NHL and currently have the best road record in the league.

The most important thing is that they leave everything they have on the ice most nights. Gretzky has spoken in a few interviews this year about how his coaching style has changed and the fact that he has taken a tougher approach towards his players.

Although the all-time scoring leader in the NHL and the player considered by many to be the greatest ever, he still has a knack for remaining as low key as someone with his past could ever hope to be.

The Columbus Blue Jackets’ surprisingly good play in the early going has flattened out though they still have a realistic chance at one of the last two playoff spots in the west. They will need some more stellar play from their goalie Pascal Leclaire and offensive production from the likes of Rick Nash, who has gone through some lengthy scoring droughts this year.

The Los Angeles Kings are the only bonafide write-off of the season. While it’s still statistically possible for them to pull off a miracle, it would require an unlikely run and the collapse of some teams above them.

Why Marc Crawford hasn’t been sacked yet is a mystery (Edit: OK, I’ll take a swing: he seems to have the confidence of his general manager through this rebuilding season.) Though any meaningful boost they could gain from a coaching change at this point would be lost in the futility of trying to qualify for the postseason.

The Chicago Blackhawks have slowed down after their impressive start and the knee injury to Jonatahan Toews is a disappointment in what was a probable Calder Trophy season. If he’s out much longer, chances at being named rookie of the year will probably slip away. At least his performance and that of Patrick Kane are reasons for Hawks fans to be optimistic.

And yet, just as with the Edmonton Oilers, it’s still reasonable for the fans of both teams to hope that they can make a second half charge and get in under the wire for the NHL’s second and more important season.

The Oilers have that incredible overtime and shootout record that keeps them going and Dustin Penner has started showing some of the potential that had Oiler fans thinking positively in the offseason. They have been hit with a bunch of injuries as well and risk missing out on the playoffs for the second year in a row. But their fans more than most recognize the possibility of unlikely events and streaks and remain some of the most loyal and passionate in the league.

A sense of excitement is in the air as talks of possible deals percolate and ricochet around the blogosphere and in the mainstream media. Who will have enough creativity, guts or just plain desperation to pull the trigger on a big trade?

Regardless of any changes made before the deadline, it’s guaranteed to be another tight finish in the NHL standings this season.

NHL Hits and Suspensions: Derian Hatcher, Alexander Steen, Joffrey Lupul

Posted January 6, 2008 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Hockey, NHL Teams, Philadelphia Flyers, Players, Rules and Officiating, Toronto Maple Leafs

Flyers logoLeafs logoThe Philadelphia Flyers are at it again. This time, however, the attempt to inflict damage on an opposing player backfired.

The hit was delivered by the Philadelphia Flyers’ Derian Hatcher, fresh off accusations that he bit the finger of the New Jersey Devils’ Travis Zajac when the two teams played on January 4th at the Rock in Newark.

But this Downiesque attempt to take off an opposing player’s head had unintended consequences during the game between the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Flyers on January 5th, 2008.

Hatcher Steen LupulIn the second period of the game, Hatcher lined up Alexander Steen with an open-ice hit, clearly launching himself at that crucial last second before impact, where the physics of such a move guarantee the most momentum and effect.

Unfortunately for Hatcher, and even more for his team-mate Joffrey Lupul, Steen’s instincts kicked in and he hit the ice. Lupul took the elbow intended for Steen straight in the chops, going down under the full weight of the lummox Hatcher. Lupul was helped off the ice with images of cheese steaks and freight trains dancing in his head.

Hatcher Steen LupulThe spinning has already started with rabid denials of the reality staring people in the face in the form of video from multiple angles.

Considering the usual template that is applied in the aftermath of such incidents, there could be some synapses short-circuiting amongst the sociopath set.

Does Lupul deserve the (potential though unconfirmed at the moment) injury he suffered because he didn’t anticipate the hit?

What about that tiresome cliche that was being spewed with regularity by certain fans early in the season? Does it get tweaked slightly?

“It’s great to be feared again to have our players scared of getting their heads taken off by one of our own goons!”

It also presents an interesting conundrum for NHL disciplinarian Colin Campbell. Do you suspend a player clearly engaging in the type of behaviour that has been suspension-worthy this season? Or do you let the fact that the hit took out one of the Flyers’ own players stand as punishment enough?

Contact and degree of injury are two of the obvious tests for the league in determining whether they will hand down further punishment for an illegal hit. It would be remarkable if the NHL expressed their displeasure for Hatcher and the Flyers by doling out an official sanction in this case.

Campbell and Gary Bettman have both hinted recently that the next incident from the Flyers would result in fines against the team.

If anyone had doubts about whether the series of attacks and illegal body checks (some blatant, some border-line) that resulted in suspensions to Philadelphia were unfortunate “coincidences,” there has been little question for some time now that they are part of a conscious and deliberate approach to the game.

As for the match-up between the Leafs and Flyers, Steve Downie’s style of conduct was on display again with a sucker punch to Jason Blake that resulted in two minor penalties and allowed the Leafs to get back in the game with a power play goal. Downie’s actions may well be in for a review by the league as well, especially considering his antics earlier in the season.

The Flyers went on to win the contest 3-2. Though it helped them little in this game, their fans will likely brush aside criticism of their style of play with the claim “winning is the most important thing, no matter how you do it.”

Video of Derian Hatcher’s Mistaken Hit on Joffrey Lupul

NHL Hockey Fights: Jarkko Ruutu vs. Darcy Tucker

Posted January 4, 2008 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Fights, Hockey, NHL Teams, Pittsburgh Penguins, Players, Toronto Maple Leafs

Leafs logoPenguins logoListening to the Toronto Maple Leafs/Pittsburgh Penguins game on radio, I didn’t get a clear sense of who had won the fight between Darcy Tucker and Jarkko Ruutu. Shameless homerism by announcers has been known to result in less than objective descriptions.

This fight took place during a game between the Leafs and Penguins in Pittsburgh on January 3rd, 2008.

It starts out at about the midway point of the second period with the game tied 1-1.

Ruutu lays a hit on Tucker in the Pittsburgh zone. Tucker starts yapping, goes after Ruutu and both players throw down their gloves. They grab hold of each other and Tucker starts throwing the right cross, three ineffectual shots barely making contact with Ruutu’s face.

Ruutu gets a hold of the sweater behind Tucker’s head, pulling his head down and knocking his helmet off. Tucker continues throwing blind shots, his right hand landing behind his opponent’s head and having little effect.

The two are now in a momentary standoff , circling and trying to get their arms free. Tucker’s face is an almost comical beet red from exertion and rage. Ruutu tries to get his right hand up and over to land a punch but Tucker has a strong hold on the sleeve of his adversary’s right arm.

Now in an almost identical reply, Tucker tries to throw a right but Ruutus’s grip renders the punch meaningless. Tucker shows some fighting skill and instantly counters with a left hook that doesn’t connect but the force of his swing knocks Ruutu slightly off balance. Once again a mirror image response as Ruutu throws a looping left hook that is way off the mark and the two fall towards each other.

Tucker eye gougeThe natural physics of any fight will force the combatants to adopt similar tactics to counter whichever situation develops and the attack style of whomever has the upper hand. Hockey fights are no different–and probably more so because of the logistics– but this bout is uncanny in the near simultaneous actions of both players.

Ruutu Tucker fightIt couldn’t have been choreographed to coincide more perfectly as both players rake their clawed hands across the other’s face at the same instant, with Tucker perhaps getting in an eye gouge in the process.

Both come out of that nasty bit of intimacy and get their right hands free at the same time. Ruutu throws a right hook that lands behind his opponent’s head and then brings his arm down and pistons a few shots into Tucker’s guts.

Tucker Ruutu fightNow they both have their right arms up and identically timed right hooks glance off both of their faces. Another pair of right hooks at the same time. Tucker throws another that knocks off Ruutu’s helmet while Ruutu leans away to adjust to having his lid removed and manages one weak right cross at the same time.

Tucker throws a few more quick right hooks but only one more lands, giving him three out of six since this recent flurry began.

A brief let up from both. Now Ruutu throws three solid right hooks, all landing. Tucker stops the barrage by getting his left hand over top of Ruutu’s head and briefly holds onto the back of his sweater. Ruutu is looping punches around Tucker’s arm however, a few of them crunching into the Leaf player’s skull.

While maintaining a slight edge to this point, the momentum now clearly shifts to the Penguins’ player. Ruutu rattles off 2, 3, 4 5, 6 right hooks to the side and back of Tucker’s head, some of them hitting home harder than others.

Now Ruutu gets his right hand completely free and throws at will, landing nine solid right crosses directly into Tucker’s face. Hard meaty blows into Tucker’s blazing red mug. Tucker takes them all and doesn’t waver once, gamely flailing with his right but connecting with none except for perhaps the last punch of the fight that may have hit its mark.

The body language says it all as the refs come in and separate the two. Tucker nearly collapsing into the safety of the penalty box, spent and thoroughly destroyed by Ruutu. It appears Tucker is almost out of it, the look of of a deer in the headlights that just got run over, conscious that a linesman is conversing with him but likely unaware of exactly what is being said.

Ruutu is loose, relaxed and confident in the knowledge that he has won handily. Praise from his teamamtes for success in battle will come when he rejoins them on the bench and later in the locker-room.

Though Tucker clearly lost this battle, his fearless approach to the fight is the only reason Ruutu could score such a victory. Remember also that Ruutu has 3 inches and at least 20 pounds on the Leafs’ player, with the added advantage in reach that goes with such a size difference as well.

It’s of course easy to dissect a fight after it occurs. In the heat of the battle the announcers are calling it in real time without the advantage of repeated replays. Still, the bias in this one is glaring.

YouTube Video of Fight Between Tucker and Ruutu

It’s admirable that Tucker didn’t go down under such a bludgeoning. But the long term effects after that kind of beating can be significant, especially for someone like Tucker who has to play with an edge to contribute to his team. It will be interesting to see how he bounces back in subsequent games and how willing he is to throw down the gloves in the near future.

NHL Overtime and Shootout Points: Claims of Artificial Parity are Exaggerated

Posted December 31, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Hockey, NHL Teams, Rules and Officiating

NHL logoWith the bunched up standings in both conferences in the NHL this season, talk has been about so-called “artificial parity.” This is usually attributed to the frustrating overtime and shootout system that sees one point given to the loser in either post-regulation game situation, while the winner receives two.

Together with the more even distribution of talent due to the salary cap, the result is there are only five points separating 5th and 13th place in the Eastern Conference.

As a sop to owners and fans and in an attempt to keep playoff races tight, the system that awards extra points for losing once the game goes beyond regulation has been ripped by many. The claims of artificiality seem plausible as well. Surely that extra point skews the standings and makes things closer than they would be otherwise.

I assumed so also. But when I re-adjusted the standings using a system that still gives the ultimate winner in overtime or the shootout two points while the loser gets nothing, there is little change in terms of how close the race is in the Eastern Conference (for the sake of brevity I limited the analysis to one conference.)

Here are the current standings in the east, followed by the rankings without a point awarded to the loser:

Current Eastern Conference Standings

1. Ottawa 55
2. New Jersey 45
3. Carolina 43
4. Montreal 45
5. Pittsburgh 42
6. New York R 44
7. Philadelphia 42
8. Buffalo 40
9. New York I 40
10. Boston 40
11. Florida 39
12. Atlanta 39
13. Toronto 38
14. Washington 35
15. Tampa Bay 33

Adjusted Eastern Conference Standings: No Overtime or Shootout Points for Losing Team

1. Ottawa 50
2. New Jersey 42
3. Carolina 40
4. Pittsburgh 40
5. New York R 40
6. Philadelphia 40
7. Montreal 38
8. New York I 38
9. Florida 38
10. Atlanta 38
11. Boston 36
12. Florida 36
13. Toronto 30
14. Washington 30
15. Tampa Bay 30

Negligible difference in terms of the separation between teams within the top eight playoff positions and little effect on those struggling to get into the eligible-for-post-season spots.

The only real change is in the rank for a handful of teams who have fared poorly when games have gone beyond the normal 60 minutes of play.

It is also worth looking at how the standings would look if the NHL reverted to a set-up used a number of years ago when a tie was a tie and both teams received one point for their efforts.

Tie games: No overtime, No shootout, Each Team Receives One Point

1. Ottawa 52
2. New Jersey 41
3. Carolina 41
4. Montreal 41
5. Philadelphia 41
6. New York R 38
7. Boston 38
8. Buffalo 36
9. Toronto 36
10. Pittsburgh 36
11. Florida 36
12. New York I 35
13. Washington 33
14. Atlanta 31
15. Tampa Bay 31

Again, little difference. The division leaders still maintain their positions while there is some movement amongst the other clubs.

This example was arrived at by simply subtracting the extra points awarded to the teams that won in the 5 minute extra frame or the shootout. Obviously this re-jigging slightly penalizes those teams who, for whatever reason, are more proficient when the extra point is on the line (in the west, Edmonton would get hammered using this model.)

So it appears as though the extra point awarded to the team who actually “loses” in the two tie-breaking formats does nothing for parity. The limitation is that this only accounts for the first half of the 2007-08 campaign. The influence may be greater once the season is complete though this should be a good representation of the overall effect.

The simple conclusion is that there is no good reason to keep this rule, especially because of the feeling of most fans that it just doesn’t seem right.

There’s something fundamentally flawed in the notion that losing deserves some kind of consolation point. It’s kind of a tacit admission by owners and management that they have their own doubts about the veracity of the whole set-up.

The most troubling aspect of the “loser gets a point”arrangement (and hence, the major shortcoming in this little experiment) is that there is no way to accurately measure how this affects the mentality of players when involved in close games and tight playoff races.

Instead of the desperation and frantic play that comes with the knowledge that a win is necessary to have a chance at the post-season, a team may let up to maintain a tie so that they are guaranteed at least one point.

Many have presented the hypothetical situation in which a team loses in overtime or the shootout in the last game of the season yet the single point is enough to get them the final playoff spot.

When you introduce variables into the basic premise of victory and defeat and advancing your own team’s cause while halting your opponents momentum in the standings, there is bound to be some negative fallout.

Many fans seem to loathe the shootout though personally I have no problem with it. There is already a cliched criticism that it’s “an individual skills competition in a team sport.”

But there are many sports in which a player’s specific skills are isolated in a way that highlights individual ability in a team competition. Often the final outcome of the game hinges on those situations. For example, free throw shots in basketball or field goal attempts in football.

Granted, those features exist throughout the entirety of the game in those sports. But so what? Simply accept that the shootout is a part of the hockey, albeit at the end of regulation and overtime. It has become an important part of the game with certain skills more important than others, just as different aspects of the game already require a shift in style and mentality.

Failure to address the importance of the shootout and giving players an out by whining about its presence are only counterproductive to a team.

There will be no return to the bland and unsatisfying tie games of the past. That doesn’t mean alternative methods of overtime aren’t worth investigating with the result that the shootout may ultimately end up taking place with less frequency.

However, it is a certainty that the NHL must eliminate the absurdity of a point being awarded to teams that lose, whether it is in overtime or the shootout.

NHL Goalies: Andrew Raycroft and Ray Emery

Posted December 30, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Hockey, NHL Teams, Ottawa Senators, Players, Toronto Maple Leafs

Leafs logoSenators logoAndrew Raycroft has let in 13 goals in his three most recent starts for the Toronto Maple Leafs, dropping the team to 13th in the Eastern Conference with the Leafs’ most recent loss, a 6-1 disaster against the New York Rangers.

Raycroft is another millstone around the neck of the organization courtesy of John Ferguson Junior. Over-paid, under-performing and a bit too comfortable with the notion of losing. The Leafs don’t have a hope in hell of unloading him in a trade anytime soon.

A player just can’t win regarding his reaction to losing, can he? Play it as smooth and professional as Raycroft and he comes off as flippant and not too bothered about whether things ever get turned around.

Dave Feschuk of the Toronto Star wrote a column at the end of last season that solidified the image of Raycroft in my mind as a goaltender who is somehow a tad too casual when the losses start piling up. Being able to look on the bright side of things is an admirable and helpful quality to have in most situations.

But “that’s good enough,” or “at least it wasn’t 7-1″ doesn’t instill confidence or impress people in the world of professional sports. Especially when fat contracts have been slurped up and performances to match the accompanying dollars have been in short supply.

Whether the image projected by certain mannerisms or responses is an accurate indication of a person’s character is often hard to determine. Personality traits and speech patterns elicit niggling feelings in others, though at first they may push such concerns aside or not even be conscious of them. It’s when on-ice performance coincides with those suspicions that the initial feelings or hunches are validated.

Regardless of how much he’s being paid, it’s hard not to feel a certain amount of sympathy for Raycroft. He could be in for the defining, and quite possibly final, stretch of play in his professional career.

What Leafs management say about Vesa Toskala is essentially meaningless as they have shown that they flat out lie regarding player injuries. He will probably be out for at least a few more games. While Scott Clemmensen has been called up from the Toronto Marlies, Raycroft will likely get ridden into either passable play or see his limited skills further disintegrate.

Goaltending problems are plaguing the other NHL team from Ontario as well.

With the Ottawa Senators, their 25 year-old back-up goalie Ray Emery is lowering his stock with his fellow players and other teams that might have been willing to take him in a trade with the Sens. His situation is in many ways the opposite of Raycroft’s.

Emery has proven he can play (though not at the level of an elite tender in my opinion). But when faced with the proposition of recovering from an injury and playing behind Martin Gerber, his less than professional conduct has him veering towards those reputation-killer tags in the NHL: “locker-room cancer,” “selfish,” and “undisciplined.”

Some fans spin the over-the-top, near tantrums from Emery as the antithesis of Raycroft. Apparent proof that he hates being denied the opportunity to compete and win so much that he will stop at nothing. If Emery’s work ethic and discipline matched this supposed desire to win, then such claims might have some credence. As it is, he’s turning himself into a liability.

Loyalty runs out faster with players who are full of themselves and they become expendable a lot sooner than they might have otherwise. Especially when they can’t always back up such arrogance with real results.

A happy medium between these two extremes would be the ideal.

A sometimes snarling, usually even-tempered piece of work who puts on the odd display of emotion, takes care of business on the ice, sucks it up when he has to take one for the team and somehow projects the feeling that he’s thankful for whatever time he has in the NHL.

Oh, and a cool mask.

CBC Hockey Night in Canada: Coach’s Corner with Don Cherry and Ron MacLean

Posted December 24, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Hockey, Media, NHL Teams

Hockey Night in Canada’s Coach’s Corner, aka the Don Cherry/Ron MacLean freak show, went beyond its usual bizarre level of awfulness on Saturday.

The desperate for attention Cherry, whose ostentatious camp outfits make the most over-the-top transvestites look withdrawn and tame in comparison, threw a petulant hissy fit on-air as MacLean interrupted his defense of eight-time loser Chris Simon.

Incoherence collides with regression into sulking infancy, alternately coddled and prodded by a professional sycophant.

Add in the insulation provided by a few decades’ worth of high ratings and you’ve got a pair of embarrassing clowns erroneously confident in the belief that they attract viewers based on something honourable, worthy of respect or representative of quality in any way.

Someone who yells, berates and becomes apoplectic at anyone who dares to hold an alternate viewpoint. Completely and totally bereft of skill in defending his opinion except for increasing the volume of his voice.

Legions of easily satisfied apologists regurgitate the same tired line whenever Don Cherry offers up another spectacle on par with public defecation: “He attracts the viewers, that’s all that matters.” Not surprising that such bland responses are offered up in defense of what is really a weak, wasted segment during the most watched television show in Canada.

The question is, how much better could it be and how many more people would tune in if there was real give and take by some of the clever and knowledgeable hockey media personalities working today?

The people who allow this to be aired week after week are simply demonstrating their lack of imagination. If CBC management really believes there aren’t any other voices available or a different format that can be tailored to tap into one of the most consistent and captive television audiences in the country, then laziness and ignorance reigns at the nation’s broadcaster.

Why exactly does Cherry remain so (apparently) popular? Regardless of his spluttering diatribes and decline in rationality, people sense that he is at least genuine in his beliefs and came to them through real experience in the world of hockey. And he wasn’t always so absurd.

When he started out he was tame by comparison and actually made an attempt to present decent arguments. His opinions appealed to the young male demographic (and likely still do.)

He praised the kind of toughness that most kids aspire to when they start playing and watching hockey. He seemed confident in his opinions and not on the verge of a mental breakdown when someone lightly countered what he had to say.

Years ago I would watch Cherry during intermissions because he usually had some interesting comments on the issues of the day. Once, during a playoff game between the Jets and the Edmonton Oilers at the Winnipeg Arena, I held up a sign before the start of the first period.

Cherry and MacLean were doing the pre-game segment at ice level. It was a day after Easter and Dale Hawerechuk had improved his play in the previous game as compared to the start of the series. No one seemed to react to my “Hawerchuk has Risen” sign except for Cherry, who saw me waving frantically and gave me the thumbs up. Maybe that was before his religious phase.

A creeping mental stagnation and commentary full of contradictions and weirdness has turned him into an embarrassing sideshow schtick. His stable of “outs” invoked whenever he can’t respond to a question with a modicum of logic is similarly pathetic.

The insinuation by many that if you criticize Cherry you are somehow against children, Christianity or “the troops” is, if not planned, then welcomed as a nice deflection. It means he rarely has to defend his point of view. He simply changes the focus to one of his safe topics.

In the episode on Saturday December 22nd, Cherry squealed like a spoiled child on the verge of crying because he didn’t get his way, shrieking that “We’re Hockey Night in Canada and we’re talkin’ about savin’ the world here! Let’s talk hockey! Now, DA TROOPS!”

Video of Coach’s Corner on Hockey Night in Canada December 22nd, 2007

Outraged? Proving that the kind of controversy he generates does actually provoke discussion? Yeah, maybe. I’m all in favour of saying the most politically incorrect things possible, as long as they can back them up. I will keep watching too, in the knowledge that people who thrive on attention but are devoid of substance will eventually do whatever it takes to keep getting headlines.

The comical aspect of someone who yelps about respect but is the most disrespectful person around is, at some level, entertainment.

Just as the impending train wreck provides easy fodder for those who want to rip Cherry, the celebration of his ignorance and hypocrisy offers a thrill for many as well. Anti-intellectualism in its purest form and the comforting thought that bluster, personal attacks and generalizations often do trump respect, quality and thought provoking analysis.

Book Review: Higher Goals by Nancy Theberge

Posted December 23, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Book reviews, Hockey, Players, Psychology of Hockey

Higher GoalsHigher Goals: Women’s Ice Hockey and the Politics of Gender is a book that looks at the inner workings of a women’s hockey team through the lens of gender politics in sport. The author, Nancy Theberge, spent a few seasons with one of the top senior women’s teams in Ontario in the early 1990’s.

Academia, especially in the humanities, has always been plagued by the need to ram the often inexplicable sludge of life into neatly arranged and labeled explanations. The most recent and well-received ideas of the day are either revered or questioned by subsequent authors who then add their two cents. For sure, many of those attempts are downright intriguing and very plausible.

My criticism is that they often seem to conveniently ignore details that would cast their renderings of the world into a less convincing narrative. While mere hints that lend credence to their hoped for conclusions are given far too much weight.

This book mostly avoids that because it isn’t overly ambitious in terms of advancing new theories. It mainly alludes to pre-existing literature within the field of sports psychology and gender studies and examines whether the author’s case study of women’s hockey fits within those frameworks.

I won’t go into too many details of the intellectual minutiae presented in the book. It isn’t so heavy going that the average person can’t get their head around the concepts and interpretations. There is really only one chapter where the soup of scholarly double-speak gets thick enough to warrant a re-reading or three.

And isn’t it always when attempts to re-order standard notions come up against universally held truisms that the most intricate and extensive verbal gymnastics are necessary?

Here, the belief held by essentially everyone in the world that men are physically stronger isn’t so much challenged as cast into a different light. That this obvious and considerable difference in strength is the basis for men’s higher level of sports competition and increased attention from spectators is because we choose to emphasize those aspects as the most worthy.

In other words, if people didn’t only “celebrate the advantages men enjoy,” and instead considered the attributes that favour women, such as “agility and long-term endurance” (this according to the book, though no evidence is given), things could be different (just to be clear, this is mainly the author referencing various writers in the same field.)

There are other situations in the book where meaning is squeezed out of unremarkable or pedestrian occurrences that really deserve no such significance. In discussing the structure of the team, the author examines the supposed irony of women who are defying stereotypes yet still play under a management structure dominated by men.

Many of the husbands and boyfriends of the players accompany the team on road trips and when the bus breaks down on one excursion, the men take it upon themselves to move the equipment to a replacement vehicle. This is kind of framed as “these independent, athletic women who play a violent, tough sport are still held captive by the standard societal stereotypes of male/female roles.”

Maybe the husbands and boyfriends didn’t want them to expend undue energy before the game? On the other hand, how would it have been spun if it was assumed the women should do the lifting? Definitely an interesting anecdote worthy of inclusion in a book that is concerned with such relations but hard to believe that it’s so meaningful.

It’s not too difficult to accept the basic assumption that all relationships are based on power and inevitably one side will possess or exert the most influence. There are a lot of thought provoking ideas here that you may or may not agree with but they are never presented in a shrill or insistent way. I won’t risk bastardizing or simplifying other concepts in the book to the point of being unfair to Theberge.

The best parts of the book are in the player interviews and the simple observations where insight is provided into women’s hockey. Each chapter covers a specific topic and some of the most intriguing include the prevalence and acceptance of lesbians on the team and within the sport in general, interaction within the locker room and physicality in women’s hockey (incidental hitting as well as the allowed variety which existed in certain senior leagues before 1990.)

There is an analysis of a wide range of different situations on and off the ice and regarding the make-up of the team, its management and the world of women’s hockey in general. This is very often looked at through the filter of how the women’s game compares to the men’s version.

The writing goes beyond the pedantic and mind-numbing academic style that is present in similar works, rendering them almost unreadable in many cases. While it is still a detached, almost clinical take on its subject compared to non-fiction solely intended for entertainment purposes, it somehow manages to remain interesting and compelling most of the time.

A slightly annoying aspect of the book is that it only uses pseudonyms, though this is no doubt accepted protocol for such studies and probably increased the likelihood of candour from those participating. Relatively short in length, the content presented is packed with detail representative of the efforts of two seasons of watching and interviewing.

Does it transcend the specialist audience it is aimed at (i.e. students or other academics) enough to make this a book hockey fans in general may enjoy reading? Somewhat, I would say.

This definitely won’t appeal to most fans looking to pass the time with a light and entertaining read. Within the world of hockey fandom, the women’s game receives short shrift and this is at least an introduction to the motivations of the players and some of the obstacles they face.

And for someone specifically interested in sports psychology and/or sociology, parents of young girls looking to get involved in the game or those who don’t mind wading through some heavier passages, it well might be an enjoyable experience.

New European Professional Hockey League

Posted December 19, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Business, Hockey, International hockey, NHL Teams

Put me down as a supporter of the European professional hockey league being proposed by Russian billionaire Alex Medvedev.

Competition is always good. It’s great to see NHL brass squirm at the thought of losing total dominance over being able to offer the world’s best hockey players the only viable league in which to ply their trade.

Bettman BurgersI don’t buy the fear mongering about further erosion of the talent pool. I like to use the restaurant analogy.

A hamburger joint is the only eatery on a busy street. It builds up a good reputation and develops a large customer base. Many people in the area eat there because the food is decent. Others do it out of convenience and because there are no other options nearby.

After a while they start taking their success for granted. They let things slide here and there, try saving money with lower quality ingredients and begin showing the first signs of arrogance.

Then, almost simultaneously, two more restaurants open their doors within close vicinity of what has long since become a local institution. The owners panic, convinced they will lose customers. They may not even be conscious of their slumping standards but at least have a gnawing sense that they are in for a well deserved hit.

But the irony is that they probably don’t have much to worry about. They may see a drop at first because of the novelty factor but traffic in the area will increase and in the end they’ll probably be busier than ever. The competition will force them to pull their heads out of their asses as well, which will end up benefiting everyone involved.

Admittedly, the analogy is a bit weak. There is an endless supply of ground beef that can be cut with sawdust and fashioned into burgers for obese slobs to plug their guts with. On the other hand, world class hockey players are in relatively short supply. Still, the comparison has some merit.

In any new European league, there is going to be a reasonable amount of money available, at least for whichever teams are directly associated with Medvedev. Perhaps some marquee players can be enticed away from the NHL. That in turn may draw some other Europeans and North Americans into the yet to be established association of teams. Increased interest generated in Europe and on a worldwide basis is going to be good for the general health of the game.

Though it would be at least a dozen or more years in coming, a higher profile in Europe will bring more youngsters into the game. That can only improve the overall level of talent down the road.

Maybe it will force some well needed retraction within the NHL. Or, if there are to be franchises relocated, at least the realization that it’s completely asinine to leave the most feasible market in North America untapped.

The NHL isn’t likely to validate such a new endeavor with anything like exhibition match-ups or discussions on inter-league play. The only way any agreements or partnerships will result for both leagues is if the upstart demonstrates through some reasonable success that it’s in for the long term.

Instead of seeing Medvedev and his plan as something to be feared, the NHL should be happy that someone else is doing the heavy lifting in the early going of expanding the popularity of hockey on a global level.

The current Russian Super League could possibly provide some teams for the new entity. Here’s hoping they do some things differently than the Super League, which have drawn a lot of attention for their development of players and ability to lure some talent from the NHL but have been lacking in their marketing of the league outside of Russia.

There are many obstacles, assuming all the details get hammered out and things go beyond the planning stage. One of the biggest will be the local markets and the relative lack of revenue that can be tapped.

The talk from Medvedev and others is that a major television contract is important in attaining any kind of real success. There is a huge audience in Europe and some broadcasters with massive clout, such as Sky Sports, could do wonders for the popularity of the sport.

Hopefully the newcomers try to distinguish themselves from the NHL in some important areas to show that there really are other ways of doing things. At the same time, they will undoubtedly steal some plays from the most popular and successful league in the world.

In an attempt to broaden the appeal of the game, perhaps they could emulate the NHL geniuses and go into non-traditional areas.

I’m sure the Napoli Neptunes could turn on a whole new generation of football-weary southern Italians to the joys of hockey.

NHL Suspensions: Chris Simon Attack on Jarkko Ruutu

Posted December 17, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Hockey, NHL Teams, New York Islanders, Pittsburgh Penguins, Players, Rules and Officiating

NHL logoIslanders logoPens logoIt’s hard to commit an act of violence in the NHL that receives universal condemnation. A player can pour every ounce of energy into an explosive, premeditated, pivoting two-handed slash to the face of his opponent and someone, nay, a legion of people, will come screaming to the defense of the piece of filth.

It doesn’t take much to provide the basis for such bizarro world rationalization. Any questionable action by the player who’s been attacked is all it takes. A genuine foul or perceived slight that went unpunished, either earlier in the game or months previously, justifies the retribution that flows his way.

A barely concealed glee at injuries resulting from cheap shots is not a difficult-to-find sentiment amongst hockey fans. To be fair, it’s the kind of bald-faced sociopathic ranting usually seen in the discussion board trenches, where the normal societal division of those who love to play the callous lunatic and those who love to be outraged is magnified a thousand times.

In the “public face” discourse of such incidents, the mainstream hockey media voices all the appropriate outrage, calls for punishment from the league and uses it as a segue to demand that the game be cleaned up. No doubt they are sincere in most cases.

But there are just as many references to the importance of “consequences” and that nebulous “code” that has never really been adequately articulated by anyone, ever. The proper and expected responses come when the glare of exceptional occurrences transcend the game and everyone is at their politically correct best.

So it is a rare instance that gutlessness is distilled into its purest essence and a moment of clarity is shared by all fans, including those of the offending player’s team and those who normally take pride in celebrating cowardice and cruelty.

Chris Simon’s insane stomp onto the ankle of Jarkko Ruutu’s ankle seems to have achieved that rarest of unanimous loathing amongst hockey fans. Simon of the Islanders, in what was a clear and deliberate move, drove his skate blade into Ruutu’s ankle, as Ruutu was lying prone on the ice.

That it was planned and Ruutu couldn’t even see the attack coming makes it even more insidious and unforgivable. Add in the potential for the seriousness of the injury that could have resulted as well as Simon’s track record and he is in for one record-setting suspension.

The odd thing about the incident is that, while it was obviously intentional, it almost seemed like an afterthought by Simon as he made his way through the gate onto the Islander’s bench.

Here is the YouTube video of the attack

He wasn’t involved in a fast moving, intense game situation. The “fog of battle” defense, that points to the speed and the near impossibility of pulling up in some cases, is irrelevant here. And yet it seemed so casual and pointless. The term “banality of evil” comes to mind (only the second Nazi reference I’ve made in the past week.)

And so the guessing game begins about the length of suspension the NHL will hand down to Simon. I really wanted to avoid checking in at Bob McKenzie’s blog over at TSN because after doing so it’s almost impossible not to be derivative of whatever he has to say on such issues.

He has an uncanny ability of putting his finger on the pulse of the league after every suspension-worthy incident and accurately predicting, within a few games, just how long the sentence will be. However, he hasn’t commented on this most recent episode yet.

Following the attack with his stick on the New York Ranger’s Ryan Hollweg last season, I believe Simon will get hit hard.

The rest of the season, with a less than subtle hope on the part of the NHL and many fans that he decides to call it a career.

First Major Trade of the 2007-08 NHL Season: Doug Weight for Andy McDonald

Posted December 15, 2007 by hockeynarrative
Categories: Anaheim Ducks, Hockey, NHL Teams, Players, St. Louis Blues

Blues logoDucks logoThe first significant trade of the NHL season and not a single online fabulist even hinted at it before it came down the pipes.

The St. Louis Blues send Doug Weight, Michal Birner (an up-and-comer currently in the AHL) and a 7th round pick in the 2008 draft to the Anaheim Ducks in exchange for Andy McDonald. It’s hard to argue anything other than the fact that the Blues got the better of the deal. Of course, there are people doing just that. The appeal of occupying the contrarian role is irresistible to many in such a situation.

McDonald’s numbers are down significantly this year and some will attribute that to no longer playing alongside Teemu Selanne. His age and durability (he leaves the Ducks as the current team leader in consecutive games played at 276) still outweigh what the Ducks receive in return.

There is the apparent desire of many pundits and fans to attach Machiavellian-like qualities to Brian Burke. Once a GM has enjoyed some success in the NHL and won at least one championship, they are forever considered geniuses regardless of what their subsequent records show.

The first caveat mentioned when dissecting this trade by those wanting to be generous to Burke and the Ducks, is that it’s all about managing team salaries in the cap era. Here there are some valid claims.

A Stanley Cup winning team naturally possesses more than its share of quality players who deserve to be rewarded with healthy contracts when the time arises. Ryan Getzlaf slurped up a well-deserved multi-year deal a few weeks ago and Corey Perry is in line for a fat pay increase before he becomes a free agent at the end of the season.

So McDonald’s contract was unloaded in preparation for signing other more important players and freeing up room for the return of Scott Niedermayer. But that explanation disregards the blunders made by Burke in the pre-season.

His failure to re-sign Dustin Penner before he became a free agent–at a cost that would no doubt have been significantly less than what he received from the Oilers–meant that he had to bring in another player to fill that hole. That resulted in a bloated contract offer for Todd Bertuzzi. Bertuzzi has been a minor contributor at best when he’s been in the lineup.

In perpetuating the idea that Burke has mythical powers and nothing is ever as it seems regarding his actions, many are speculating that this is only the first step in a well thought out multi-staged plan. That well might be true.

But if the goal was freeing cap space, picking up prospects and getting some added experience for the rest of the season with an older player who can still contribute, surely the Ducks could have gotten an even better return by bundling Ilya Bryzgalov together with McDonald. Of course, Bryzgalov was put on waivers and snapped up by the Phoenix Coyotes earlier in the season.

The Downside of No-Trade Clauses

No-trade clauses have increased in prevalence in the past few seasons. They are ultimately a burden for teams and provide a false sense of security for players.

Doug Weight had such a clause, refused to waive it at first and then eventually agreed. Which leads a person to think that they’re just a recipe for some unpleasant psychological games and the kind of pressure that can turn a person’s guts just enough to say to hell with it.

Some cryptic hints from Weight as to what went down in discussions with Blues’ management leading up to this trade.

I suppose you can spin such tough actions from a team in two ways. The kind of hard-nosed pragmatism that does whatever it takes to win. Or, the type of behaviour that turns off at least a few players and makes them question what will happen when they are in the same situation.

Without any emotional stake in either team, unjust treatment of a player makes me hope he goes beyond any reasonable expectations and proves everyone wrong.

And that’s one of the great things about trades. Regardless of how many people weigh in about who “won” the deal, it usually isn’t until at least the end of the season that any real conclusions can be drawn.